Project Profile: Beehive BridgeAECbytes Profile (November 5, 2019)

Svigals + Partners, an architecture, art and advisory firm describes the implementation of AEC technology on its "Beehive Bridge" project in New Britain, CT.


What are the vital statistics of the project? (This includes project type, size, stage of design or construction, project team, etc.)

Project type: Bridge Renovation and Public Art Installation 
Location: New Britain, CT 
Stage: Project is in final inspections 
Client: City of New Britain 

Project team

  • Fuss & O’Neill – Engineering and Traffic 
  • Svigals + Partners – Architectural Design and Artwork 
  • Richter & Cegan – Landscape Architecture 
  • Atelier Ten – Lighting Design 
  • Laviero Contractors - General Contractor  
  • SignPro Inc – Fabricator 

The “Beehive Bridge” is a 265-foot-long highway overpass in the city of New Britain, Connecticut, connecting the two parts of the city that are divided by a highway. Svigals + Partner created a design scheme for a pedestrian-friendly streetscape with an abstract take on the “beehive” theme that has long been associated with New Britain—it features colorful translucent panels in an abstract honeycomb pattern that separate the overpass visually from the highway below (Figure 1). In shades of gold and yellow, the panels produce a variety of patterns and colors depending on the time of day and position of the sun. Building on the theme, the design then incorporates contemporary artwork integrated directly into the structure: four large-format stainless-steel honeybee sculptures, and an outsized beehive in the center of the bridge. Energy-efficient LED lighting illuminates the bridge, ensuring safety for pedestrians and cyclists after dark.

Figure 1. A conceptual rendering of the project, and the final constructed bridge. (Images courtesy of Svigals + Partners)

Which were the main software applications used for this project, and how were they used?

The two main software applications used were Rhino and Revit. Rhino was used for early massing studies of the bridge railing and the development of the sculptural elements (Figure 2). We then moved to Revit for the development of the bridge railing and project documentation (Figure 3). 

Figure 2. Developing the sculptural elements of the project in Rhino. (Images courtesy of Svigals + Partners)

To optimize the process of documenting the railing design, it was important for the team to keep all production work in a single program. Keeping all our design exploration and creation of the construction document set in Revit allowed for efficient modifications of design that could be immediately translated to the drawings.

Figure 3. The Revit model of the bridge used for reviewing the railing scale and proportions, and of the final sculptural railing. (Images courtesy of Svigals + Partners)

Did the project have a specific approach or methodology for the application of AEC technology?

As a firm specializing in architecturally-integrated art, a combination of physical and digital modeling is essential to our design process. The use of Rhino allowed us to quickly develop, test, and template sculptural forms in 3D before building physical models in paper, metal, and resin.  

The irregular shape of the rail was defined by its curving grid and triangular panels with edges supported by steel posts (Figure 4). Using advanced Revit modeling techniques, we created smart forms and components with the use of parameters and adaptive modeling.  Adaptive components were employed to smoothly manipulate the triangular families into different positions on the railing grid, following parametric rules and adapting to multiple insertion points, and creating a synchronized geometry of triangular panels repeating on an organic curve (Figure 5).

Figure 4. Curve study of the railing in Rhino. (Images courtesy of Svigals + Partners)

Figure 5. Adaptive components used for panel design in Revit. (Images courtesy of Svigals + Partners)

This technique allowed for easier manipulation of the curve radius and creation of multiple panel modules that flexibly adapt to various curve conditions.  As a result, the team explored multiple design alternatives with very quick turnaround times. 

Would you consider this project to be an example of the cutting-edge use of technology? If so, how and why?

While parametric modeling in Revit has been around for a while, this was our office’s first venture into this type of computational design. It offered us powerful tools to streamline the workflow. Since this bridge is experienced at close range by pedestrians and from afar by vehicular traffic, the scale of the panels and feel of the curve played a crucial role in how the bridge is perceived and experienced.

In search of the ideal form, multiple analyses of the railing curvature were performed, including review of various individual panel sizes, post spacing, and curve radii (Figure 6). This was also the first time we used Rhino models to create final details in our construction documents. 

Figure 6. Railing design iterations in Revit testing different panel scales and curve shapes. (Images courtesy of Svigals + Partners)

What are some of the main challenges you faced in your implementation of AEC technology on this project?

From the preliminary design stage, the team was aware that the unique shape of the railing would require close coordination with the contractors. With the number of individual elements to be documented, the use of the Alias plug-in provided the ability to flatten the curve and extract individual panel dimensions, while Revit provided the documentation of the geometry. Since no two panels are alike, this was an exciting step toward providing a simplified layout for the fabricator to utilize in production.  

The fabricator ended up using our Revit model itself, which helped convey the complexity and feasibility of the design. The collaborative approach between teams resulted in a smooth construction process and a perfectly executed design. 

Were there any requirements on this project that were not addressed by currently available technologies?

Each panel of the railing is unique, so there are very few identical components in this design. One thing we would do differently in the future is to create an automated scheduling or categorization of individual parts. 

Any additional information/observations/insights on the use of AEC technology for this project that you would like to share?

Because the parametric model and Rhino models were developed with a high level of precision, our files were a valuable resource for fabrication teams. The availability of digital files cut down on development time for the fabrication engineers, ultimately lowering the cost of the project.


Acknowledgments: The responses to the questions for this profile were provided by Svigals + Partners. The profile was facilitated by Adam Sullivan of C.C. Sullivan.

AECbytes content should not be reproduced on any other website, blog, print publication, or newsletter without permission.

Related Archive Articles

  • Using the Morph Tool to Create Custom Objects in ArchiCAD
  • Commonly viewed as Graphisoft's answer to SketchUp, the Morph Tool is a fairly new addition to ArchiCAD that can be used to create freeform elements. It is also a powerful early design tool for massing studies and for creating custom objects. This tutorial shows how it works and how it can be used to create a custom shape in ArchiCAD.
  • Measuring BIM's Disruption: Understanding Value Networks of BIM/VDC
  • In this article, John Tobin, Director of Architecture at EYP, shares his insights on how the two contrasting types of innovation, "sustaining" and "disruptive" — as popularized in the book, The Innovator's Dilemma — can be applied to the AEC technology industry.
  • Got Macros? Scripting and Coding for BIM
  • In this article, Karen Kensek, Assistant Professor in USC's School of Architecture, advocates the writing and use of macros in AEC firms to improve the efficiency of BIM, which "out of the box" is not synchronized with the way firms work.